W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > July 2007

Re: editorial: 7.11.1 The instance() Function

From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:41:58 -0700
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFDA784ADA.281A6195-ON88257317.0003BC23-88257317.0003DAF1@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Elliotte,

This will be fixed and diff-marked in XForms 1.0 Third Edition, which is 
nearly complete at this point.
(It's already fixed in the source XML for the spec).

John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com 

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer

Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> 
07/11/2007 05:14 AM

John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
Re: editorial: 7.11.1 The instance() Function

John Boyer wrote:
> Hi Elliotte,
> Thanks for taking the time to report this.  It turns out that someone 
> else also noted this in last call.  An editor's draft of the post last 
> call spec (both with and without diff marking) is available from the 
> Forms WG page.  This spec is subject to very frequent update as the last 

> call comments are addressed, but in it you will see that this particular 

> issue has already been fixed.

There may be a little confusion on version here. It sounds like you're 
referring to XForms 1.1. I was reporting this minor bug against XForms 
1.0. It should be addressed in the 1.0 errata in case there's ever a 3rd 

Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 00:42:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:25:12 UTC