W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [LC] 3.3.2 The instance Element (PR#58)

From: John Boyer <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:39:10 -0500
Message-Id: <200707061739.l66HdACJ011856@htmlwg.mn.aptest.com>
To: Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl
CC: www-forms-editor@w3.org

Hi Steven,

Of the four points you make below, three are editorial and have been corrected.

In addition, the use of the "barename" terminology was incorrect and has also
been fixed.  It was alluding to a barename XPointer, but the terminology has now
been corrected to indicate a fragment identifier URI Reference (including the
leading # mark), which is the proper term from RFC 2396.  Please see the
diff-marked text in the editor's draft available from the Forms WG website and
let us know if you have any more concerns about this issue.

Thanks,
John Boyer 

> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#structure-model-instance
> 
> Has the sentence "If the host language may treat failure to traverse
> the link as an exception (4.5.2 The xforms-link-exception Event)."
> 
> It also contains the sentence ending:
> 
> "with a resource-uri indicating either the URI for an external
> instance, a barename URI reference to an identified internal instance,
> or empty string for an with an unidentified internal instance. .|"
> which
> - ends with two full-stops
> - "empty string for an with an"
> - I don't know what a barename URI reference is.
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 17:43:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:15 GMT