- From: John Boyer <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:06:46 -0500
- To: Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl
- CC: www-forms-editor@w3.org
Hi Steven, The working group reduced the number of alternatives to one per hash algorithm as requested. The only difference is that the keywords chosen were based on the algorithm names as given in their specifications: MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-384 and SH-512. The examples were also corrected. Thanks, John Boyer > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#fn-digest > > Why bother with all the alternatives for the parameter? Why not just > md5/sha1/sha256/sha384/sha512 > > In the examples the function has the wrong name. > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2007 07:07:58 UTC