Re: Response to CR ISSUE 46: 11.5 urlencoding -- tiny clarifications needed

I accept.

.micah

--- Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Your issue sent to the W3C XForms WG about the XForms 1.0  Candidate
> Recommendation 12 November 2002
>  <http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-xforms-20021112/>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-xforms-20021112/ 
> 
> Your issue is archived at
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Nov/0091.html
> XForms WG Resolution:
> Response: 
> Resolution 2003-03-4.2:
>
<file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Thierry%20Michel/Bureau/2003mar04
> .htm#resolution2>  XForms should specify name and value pairs and
> refer
> to RFC for encoding. SPEC CHANGE
> 
> 
> 
> Please respond to state that you agree with this Resolution.
> 
>  
> Thierry MICHEL
> W3C/ERCIM
>  
> Thierry MICHEL
> W3C/ERCIM
>  
> 


=====
Find out what the fuss about XForms is all about. Full text of my book in-progress online at http://dubinko.info/writing/xforms/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com

Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 09:17:55 UTC