RE: 2002Aug/0009-Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG ab out the XForms Last Call WD

I thought that I've already answered to this.

Yes, I am agree, as we could not find a better alternative.

Regards,
  Konstantin Piroumian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:30 PM
> To: Piroumian Konstantin
> Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org
> Subject: 2002Aug/0009-Response to your issue sent to the 
> XForms WG about the XForms Last Call WD
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your issue sent to the W3C XForms WG about the XForms Last 
> Call Working Draft 21 August 2002 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xforms-20020821
> 
> Your issue is archived at 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-> editor/2002Aug/0009.html
> 
>  XForms WG Resolution:
> Response: no suitable replacement suggested (already replied) 
> See reply 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-> editor/2002Aug/0030.html
> See reply 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-> editor/2002Aug/0034.html
> 
> 
> Please respond to state that you agree with this Resolution.
> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 09:32:48 UTC