W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > September 2002

Re: [Moderator Action] XForms WD 20020821 - 3.2.1 - include / XInclude ?

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:06:45 +0200
Message-ID: <146401c25363$e6d212f0$228a608a@inria.fr>
To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>, <xforms@yahoogroups.com>

Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org
----- Original Message -----
From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: [Moderator Action] XForms WD 20020821 - 3.2.1 - include / XInclude
?


>
>
>
> Yesterday I raised the issue of consistency of value of id attributes
arising
> from the following statement in 3.2.1:
> "A host language must include an attribute of type xsd:ID on each XForms
> element."
>
> I have a supplementary question - what is the suggested / required
mechanism
> for a host language to "include" an attribute on each XForms element?
>
> Is the "include" mechanism XInclude? If so why isn't that clearly stated
(and
> referenced towards the end of the document)? If not XInclude, what is the
> proposed mechanism?
>
> Is only one mechanism acceptable? Or several? Shouldn't that be more
clearly
> stated?
>
> Andrew Watt
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:07:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:12 GMT