W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Message 67: Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG abo ut the XForms Last Call WD

From: Joel Faul <jfaul@cardiff.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:36:11 -0700
Message-ID: <E840F0B7E6189547BDB91DA8BF2228AB03D7E105@csmail.cardiff.com>
To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org


Thank you for considering my comments and for strengthening the exit
criteria. The new exit criteria are certainly an improvement over the
original. I think we could do more, but in the interest of moving forward, I
agree with this resolution to my comments.

J Joel Faul			Director, Product Development
jfaul@cardiff.com		http://cardiff.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Joel Faul
Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org
Subject: Re: Message 67: Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG
abo ut the XForms Last Call WD

Joel Faul,

Your issue sent to the W3C XForms WG about the XForms Last Call Working
Your issue is archived at


XForms WG Resolution about CR exit criteria: (from the status document of
the upcoming CR ):

On completion of the review, the XForms Working Group will advance the
specification to Proposed Recommendation according to the following exit

Sufficient reports of implementation experience have been gathered to
demonstrate that XForms Processors based on the specification are
implementable and have compatible behavior.

An implementation report shows that there is at least
    * one fully conforming XForms full processor
    * one fully conforming XForms Basic processor
    * one interoperable implementation of each feature

and formal responses to all comments received by the Working Group.

Please respond to state that you agree with this Resolution.
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 16:36:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:25:05 UTC