RE: (Editorial) examples of XForms XPath functions missing namespace prefix

I hereby withdraw this Last Call comment. It is ok for a spec to use non-prefixed XPath extension functions, just like XSLT, and XML
Signature does.

-mikko

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-forms-editor-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-forms-editor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Mikko Honkala
> Sent: 25. tammikuuta 2002 11:43
> To: www-forms-editor@w3c.org
> Cc: w3c-forms@w3c.org
> Subject: (Editorial) examples of XForms XPath functions missing
> namespace prefix
>
>
> There are many examples in the spec that use the XForms XPath functions that are missing the namespace prefix.
>
> The namespace prefix has to be used always in XPath extension functions.  (e.g. at="cursor('cartUI') =>
> at="xforms:cursor('cartUI')".
>
> Incorrect examples can be found at least in sections:
>
> '7.4.3.1 property()' :
> 	calculate="property('version')"
> '7.4.2.5 cursor()' :
> 	at="cursor('cartUI')"
> '9.3 repeat : Example: homogeneous coll...'
> 	4 * cursor()
> '9.3.2 Nested Repeats' :
> 	cursor()
>
> -mikko
>
>
>