W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms-editor@w3.org > July 2002

RE: 67- Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG about the X Forms Last Call WD

From: Joel Faul <jfaul@cardiff.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:28:46 -0700
Message-ID: <E840F0B7E6189547BDB91DA8BF2228AB0342319C@csmail.cardiff.com>
To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org

Hi Thierry,

This doesn't appear to be changed from the original wording in the Last Call
document.

The exit criteria section should have the following changes:

* statement 1 needs better definition than 'sufficient'
* the exit criteria must include a test suite
* there must be at least one implementation that conforms to the whole of
XForms Full, in addition to "at least one implementation of each feature"
* there must be at least one implementation that conforms to the whole of
XForms Basic, on target hardware, in addition to "at least one
implementation of each feature"
* unimplementable features should be dropped to reach Recommendation status
sooner rather than later

Thanks for following up,

Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:05 AM
To: Joel Faul
Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org
Subject: Re: 67- Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG about the
XForms Last Call WD


Joel,

This is the exit criteria for CR XForms spec, in status of the document

the XForms Working Group will advance the specification to Candidate
Recommendation according to the following exit criteria:

  1.. Sufficient reports of implementation experience have been gathered to
demonstrate that XForms Processors based on the specification are
implementable and have compatible behavior.
  2.. An implementation report shows that there is at least one
implementation of each feature.
  3.. Formal responses to all comments received by the Working Group.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Faul" <jfaul@cardiff.com>
To: "Thierry Michel" <tmichel@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:48 PM
Subject: RE: 67- Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG about the
XForms Last Call WD


> Thierry,
>
> I would prefer to see the actual exit criteria text before agreeing. Is
that
> possible?
>
> Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:13 AM
> To: jfaul@cardiff.com
> Cc: www-forms-editor@w3.org
> Subject: 67- Response to your issue sent to the XForms WG about the
> XForms Last Call WD
>
>
> Joel,
>
> Your issue sent to the W3C XForms WG about the XForms Last Call Working
> draft
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xforms-20020118/
>
> Your issue is archived at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Feb/0099.html
>
> XForms WG Resolution:
>
>
> Indeed we plan to go to CR. We will exit CR on the basis of implementation
> reports that reference a test suite.
>
>
>
> Please respond to state that you agree with this Resolution.
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 13:28:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 June 2009 18:12:11 GMT