W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: SVG Fonts inside of OpenType fonts? [Cross-post from www-font@w3.org]

From: Brian Stell <bstell@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:30:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGD0vg89MhNd2nqytsk7+fNJNfr6g6e6K0Zv-yx97mSJvSx3Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: Stuart Gill <stuartg@google.com>, list.adam@twardoch.com, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>, www-svg@w3.org, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, OpenType List <opentype-migration-list@indx.co.uk>
Could we use an coverage table (see OpenType Layout Common Table Formats) to
handle mapping SVG glyphs to TT glyphs?

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> I don't think we should have a separate "smap" table. That would add
> complexity to character lookup paths. A large sparse sloc table would
> probably be OK; if not, use a different representation that more efficiently
> represents gaps.
>
>
> Rob
> --
> "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not
> in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us
> our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not
> sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John
> 1:8-10]
>
Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 16:30:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 July 2011 16:32:43 GMT