W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > January to March 2011

RE: Comments on the WOFF Last Call

From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:39:41 -0800
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE2F61DA5FA23945A4EA99A212B1579537CDA581BD@nambx03.corp.adobe.com>
The following action does address my comment. Thank you very much.

Steve Zilles


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 6:22 AM
> To: Stephen Zilles
> Cc: www-font@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Comments on the WOFF Last Call
> 
> On Wednesday, January 5, 2011, 6:35:22 PM, Stephen wrote:
> 
> SZ> I note the following:
> SZ> 1.       The introduction has normative conformance requirements.
> SZ> This does not seem like the right place for such MUSTs.
> 
> We agree, and have resolved to split this section into an Introduction
> proper, with no conformance requirements, and another (normative) section
> called 'General Requirements' which contains those conformance
> requirements.
> 
> Please confirm that this change, once made, addresses your comment.
> 
> Tracker, this relates to
> 
> ACTION-63: Respond to Stephen Zilles re. introduction/normative
> Chris Lilley
> 
> ACTION-64: Remove normative statements from introduction to new section
> 'General Requirements'
> Jonathan Kew
> 
> (Steve, your other comments will be the subject of separate mails, to help
> our last call tracking process).
> 
> 
> 
> --
>  Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
>  Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 16:40:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:10 GMT