W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Last call comments on WOFF

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:59:01 +0100
Message-ID: <1955401944.20110208155901@w3.org>
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
CC: www-font@w3.org
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, 4:16:26 PM, Bert wrote:

BB> 2) I like the clear and careful language in the introduction. (So  
BB> this is not an issue, not even a criticism, but it *is* a  
BB> comment. :-) ) Especially the way it explains what WOFF is not (a new
BB> font format), and what it is for (@font-face).

BB> That doesn't meant there will be no confusion, but I think the spec  
BB> does as well as it can. EXI can explain that it is just XML with a  
BB> syntax optimized for streaming, but people still see it as a new  
BB> format. With WOFF it will be the same.


Thank you. We are glad you like it.


-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 14:59:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:10 GMT