- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:01:19 +0900
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>, www-font@w3.org
On 2010/11/19 1:52, Chris Lilley wrote: > On Thursday, November 18, 2010, 4:36:48 PM, Laurence wrote: > LP> If this proposal is attractive, I propose the standard value > LP> "font/woff" for the format attribute. It would be a MAY not a MUST in the spec, of course. > > Please see discussions on media type at the Lyon f2f meeting. In the end we decided to go with application/font-woff because past experience showed that attempting to registera font top level type would encounter significant resistance at IANA. For the record only: IANA does not have any say in whether a new top-level type will be added or not. This is completely up to the IETF, for which IANA just serves as a clerical registry. It is true that years ago, an attempt to introduce a font/ top level type failed. A few months ago, there has been a new attempt to introduce a top font/ type. I think it would have had a chance, as the proposal also contained a number of actual font formats for registration. But I understand it if you don't want to wait for the font/ top level type to happen. Regards, Martin. -- #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Sunday, 21 November 2010 09:01:57 UTC