W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > January to March 2010

RE: FtF Meeting

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:01:31 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E10D6CF00@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Well Tab, you know I tried :)

We can talk about this face to face later this month.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Tab Atkins Jr.
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: Håkon Wium Lie
> Cc: Chris Lilley; www-font@w3.org
> Subject: Re: FtF Meeting
> 
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
> wrote:
> > Indeed. Thanks goes to W3C staff for finding consensus around WOFF.
> As
> > a result, the web will be a better place; for browser vendors, web
> > site developers, and font vendors it will be a more predictable place.
> 
> If CWT is killed, that just means it'll still be a decade before I can
> ship a site without doubling all my @font-face rules and producing two
> versions of every font file.  This is not a win for us web developers,
> when there is such an easy path to solving this.
> 
> ~TJ
> 

Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 17:02:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:05 GMT