- From: Ben Weiner <ben@readingtype.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:53:15 +0100
- To: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Hi, John Hudson wrote: > But requiring more than one format for conformance seems to me to also > put an unnecessary burden on new entrants in the browser market. Let's > say a company comes along with a new browser, in a situation in which > WOFF is the uncontested favoured format for web fonts, is supported in > all existing browsers and is the chosen format for both web authors > and font vendors. What good reason would there be for requiring that > company to code support for some other format in order to be able to > claim conformance? Surely it will support OpenType etc when using local fonts? Ben -- Ben Weiner | http://readingtype.org.uk/about/contact.html
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 10:53:55 UTC