On 8/6/2009 5:08 PM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > I suggest calling the format > > Web Opentype Format, or perhaps > Web Opentype Font > > and use the ".wof" extension. WOF is easier to pronouce than WebOTF. > > Alternatively, "wot" is also a good name -- I believe Robert suggested > it (for something slighly different) in the past. Not sure what the obsession is with three-letter file extensions; both *.wof and *.wot are completely meaningless to a casual user. Unless it's already reserved somewhere, using *.webfont seems the most reasonable solution: it has clear meaning and clear pronunciation. If you *must* have short, pronounceable forms, maybe you could make *.wf or *.wef aliases.Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 10:46:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 October 2009 10:46:28 GMT