W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Next step?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:33:08 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0908121533v521e0e7bxa74e6a0c3a15a968@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Weiner <ben@readingtype.org.uk>
Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>

So for practical purposes we're looking at, what, a MUST for both EOTL
and WebOTF?  And probably a SHOULD for OTF?

Both EOTL and WebOTF still need some new names officially decided on, btw.  ^_^

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:34:08 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Next step?"
Previous message: Ben Weiner: "Re: Next step?"
In reply to: Ben Weiner: "Re: Next step?"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Next step?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT