Re: WebOTF Proposal

On Aug 7, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Christopher Slye wrote:

> I am actually not so excited about "WebOTF" as a name. Was it  
> necessary to toss out "webfont"? Two syllables is better than four. :)

We thought that it would be better to reference the format that it  
wraps. This way if another font format needs to be wrapped, we have  
something to follow. WebPhotoFont, WebUFO, etc.

Tal