- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:17:15 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, www-font@w3.org
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 10:39 +0200, Chris Lilley wrote: > TL> Which leaves the EOTL proposal in the uncomfortable > TL> situation of insisting that rootstrings be enforced - > > EOTL has no rootstrings. > > So your statement makes no sense. Sorry. "... of insisting that protections be enforced." On the one hand, implementers will not, in general, be free to implement EOTC. On the other hand, to process EOTL, programs have to detect and reject EOTC files. Detecting and rejecting EOTC files in this context amounts to enforcing EOTC protections. -t
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 17:17:56 UTC