On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Thomas Lord<lord@emf.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 16:44 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> Then we can... call it something else? If the name is what's making >> you hang back, then we're basically done I guess. > > No, somebody already called "no takebacks". > > More seriously, it's called "-lite" because that's > what it is, it's not what it is because it's > called that. It's revealing to hear the suggestion > "let's just change the name, then". Well, when the objection is "I don't like the name", what else are you supposed to do? I suppose I'm revealing that I'm... reasonably flexible? Not sure if that's a bad thing. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 22:18:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT