W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:14:20 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0908031214y4177cafbod232ed229db063f7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
Cc: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Thomas Lord<lord@emf.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 13:16 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
>> I am not a lawyer, as I stated before.  However, EOTL does not *allow*
>> you to ignore rootstrings, it *requires* you to.
>
> The opposite is apparently the case.
>
> An EOTC file with a non-nil rootstring has a
> version number distinct from EOTLs and apparently
> an EOTL processor MUST reject that file.

If it only support EOTLs, yes.  If it supports EOTC as well, it must
process it as an EOTC file, *not* an EOTL, if it wants to be
conforming.

I have no idea how this is opposite, or even relevant to, what I said, though.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 19:15:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT