- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:21:28 -0700
- To: rfink@readableweb.com
- CC: robert@ocallahan.org, 'www-font' <www-font@w3.org>
Richard Fink wrote: > If you or someone else hasn't started a thread on Typophile to discuss this tomorrow, I'll start one. Go ahead, but note that while a number of font makers are active as individuals on Typophile, many are not and those that are might not be in a position to make public statements on behalf of their companies. I also think that if you (or I) just go to font makers and say 'Will you license your fonts for the EOTL format as proposed here [link to John's 1.1 draft]?', the first response you will get from a lot of people will be 'What about .webfont?' So you'll need to explain the context of your question. I will be initiating some discussions about EULAs on other channels, and with permission from the participants may be able to report back here. I can't promise that, though. JH
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 02:22:11 UTC