Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Thomas Lord<lord@emf.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:11 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>
>> If you look at the original submission, section 3.1 describes the header in question.
>> (There is a typo though so replace 0x00010000 with 0x00020000). Notice the absence
>> of rootstring space.
>
> The very fact that you have to replace the
> version number is proof that the rootstring
> space has not been eliminated but merely
> compressed.   No future extension of EOTL
> can reasonably use the 0x10000 version number
> unless that future extension is EOT (sans
> honoring root string restrictions).

Thomas, what are you *talking* about?  I am completely unable to get
anything sensical out of this post.

~TJ

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 21:43:57 UTC