On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Thomas Lord<lord@emf.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 20:11 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > >> If you look at the original submission, section 3.1 describes the header in question. >> (There is a typo though so replace 0x00010000 with 0x00020000). Notice the absence >> of rootstring space. > > The very fact that you have to replace the > version number is proof that the rootstring > space has not been eliminated but merely > compressed. No future extension of EOTL > can reasonably use the 0x10000 version number > unless that future extension is EOT (sans > honoring root string restrictions). Thomas, what are you *talking* about? I am completely unable to get anything sensical out of this post. ~TJReceived on Friday, 31 July 2009 21:43:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT