- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:42:31 -0700
- To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Cc: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, robert@ocallahan.org, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 20:15 -0700, Thomas Phinney wrote: > I should point out that it was my suggestion that a browser could > simply reject rendering of a font that had root strings. My reason for > suggesting that was Hakon's concern that a browser that simply ignored > the root string could open itself up to DMCA action or some such. That alone is justification for taking EOT-lite off the table, if what you say sticks. That is why I ask for a positive assertion that UAs should render even in the face of a mis-matched non-nil rootstring. -t
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 03:43:11 UTC