- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:44:30 -0400
- To: "Thomas Lord" <lord@emf.net>, "John Daggett" <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "www-font" <www-font@w3.org>
On Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:10 PM Thomas Lord wrote: > > > > If EOT-lite becomes the recommendation, is the > > > previously discussed patent de-encumberence of MTX > > > included in the deal? > > > No, as currently defined EOT-Lite does not include MTX compression. > > That's something that will come up as things move > forward. I think that's a problem. Can we hear > from Monotype on that? Maybe they wouldn't mind > if MTX patents became safe to implement if EOT-lite > is adopted. Otherwise, we wind up with an arguably > discriminatory Recommendation. > Monotype would be very supportive if MTX compression is included as part of EOT-Lite Recommendation. Our offer and our commitment remains the same - we will provide unrestricted royalty-free patent license if MTX is included in the deal. Vladimir
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 02:44:48 UTC