- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:25:02 +0000
- To: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
> From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Dave Crossland > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:19 PM > But, if that is the case - if the existing cross site restriction is > good enough for foundries who support EOT, and their aim is to get > profiting from web fonts ASAP, why isn't supplying TTFs with corrupt > NAME tables and a changed file extension good enough? As compared to what alternative ? How would those TTFs work in IE ? > That seems like an adequate speedbump; it has acceptable cross linking > restriction, installation in desktops is refused for such files, and > foundries can supply different files for desktop and web licenses. I > think it must be included in any summaries of the various proposals. Fine by me.
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 22:25:43 UTC