W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: A way forward

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:22:38 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600907241522r40a90f8fhdd80136b8636e83a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Sylvain Galineau
<sylvaing@microsoft.com>wrote:

>   If they're not, then EOT-Lite isn't very useful, since serving non-free
> fonts to IE users (its great advantage) will require burdensome and fragile
> Referer checking.
>
>  Yup. Whether that’s so burdensome it’s worth designing a new format
> should not, however, be up to a tiny group of browser vendor
> representatives. I’d like authors to voice their opinion. I am also asking
> Ascender to clarify their licensing policy.
>

Good, thanks. Without this information one can't evaluate the benefits of
EOT-Lite.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 22:23:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT