W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: A way forward

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:00:35 +0200
Message-ID: <19049.63171.890958.444344@opera.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: (wrong string) åkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Also sprach Sylvain Galineau:

 > > I think ZOT is a very good idea.
 > 
 > But unless Microsoft also fixes all their legacy quirks,
 > cross-browser support for ZOT would be as bad for web designers as
 > EOT-Lite

Yes, you should fix your bugs. That would make life easier for web
designers and your fellow browser makers. 

ZOT is different from EOTx though -- other browsers wouldn't have to
replicate all the EOTx-related bugs and quirks. Here's a guess: not a
single bug have been fixed in that code base for 10 years.

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 18:01:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT