Christopher Fynn wrote: > Isn't this discussion only going on because MS and font > vendors insist on something different or more complicated? Because of type designers. And it is about "different" rather than "more complicated" since there is no complication. Quoting John Daggett: > Any of the solutions that have been proposed (webfont, > EOT-Lite, ZOT) are relatively easy to implement, assuming > no DRMish features are involved. KarstenReceived on Thursday, 23 July 2009 11:39:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:03 GMT