On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Thomas Phinney<tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu> wrote: > IMO, the main benefit of MTX is not that it is much more compressed > than anything else (as you say, it isn't), but that it is the only > in-font compression scheme that is compatible with the existing > installed base of IE. Does IE not support gzip for EOT files, or is there some disadvantage to HTTP-level (not in-font) compression that I'm missing? The disk space should be negligible, bandwidth is the only concern I can see.Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2009 17:07:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 25 July 2009 00:12:03 GMT