- From: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:39:44 -0400
- To: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Tal Leming<tal@typesupply.com> wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Thomas Phinney wrote: > >> Tal, Erik, would it be a requirement of .webfont format that if such a >> URL is present, browsers enforce it? > > As the proposal said, we are interested in hearing from the browser > developers on two possible ways of handling the <allow> element: > > 1. An unobtrusive alert system based on matching the viewed URL to the > <allow> element. This is not the same as complete rejection of the fonts. > 2. A "Page Info" interface element that would show the contents of the > <allow> element, along with the other relevant metadata, to the user upon > request. > > On idea 1, John, Sylvain and Håkon seem to have indicates that they could > not accept this. > On idea 2, John seems to have implied interest. > > Tal Righto, thanks! T -- "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened." - Sir Winston Churchill
Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 19:40:23 UTC