W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback

From: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:08:28 -0700
Message-ID: <f49ae6ac0907031408i202dd9f4me63b8fdb6167cb15@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Cc: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aryeh Gregor<Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:16 PM, John Hudson<tiro@tiro.com> wrote:
>> Perhaps because you -- and many other people in this debate -- seem only to
>> consider the browser market?
> Because the browser implementers are the ones who decide what formats
> they'll support.  All other parties are therefore pragmatically
> irrelevant except insofar as they can get the browser implementers to
> agree with them.

You could replace "browser implementers" with "font owners" and the
statement would be equally true.

The only difference being that the critical mass percentage is a bit
different. For browsers, you need both IE and Firefox and preferably
Safari as well. Everything else is window dressing. (I write that even
though I use Google Chrome myself, just being pragmatic.) For font
vendors, there's no specific critical mass.


Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 21:09:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:40 UTC