Thomas Lord wrote: >The rationale for "EOT Lite" appears to remain nothing >more or less than *breaking* interop by gratuitously >proliferating font formats. Shame on that proposal. I'm not sure I understand what you're saying; can you try again, focusing on the details other than the gratuitiveness?Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 22:49:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 11 June 2011 00:14:02 GMT