W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:44:09 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600907011544hcfaac0em47e6da5bb3f4b33b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>wrote:

> Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
> >Not so. I've indicated willingness to find a compromise:
> >
> >  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0412.html
> Your "compromise" still includes the one "feature" that we (and font
> vendors) have said isn't acceptable - direct TTF/OTF linking.

I don't think anyone who's already implemented support for direct TTF/OTF
linking would consider dropping support for it. I didn't think dropping that
support was a precondition for font vendors buying into Ascender's
New-Web-Fonts-Proposal. If it is, then I think no compromise is possible.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 22:44:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:40 UTC