- From: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:31:59 +0100
- To: www-font@w3.org
- Message-Id: <685D3130-23D9-4F32-859D-AEC26F21DBC9@jfkew.plus.com>
Here is a suggested description of "ZOT", a compressed font format intended for Web-font use. This is designed to be "lightweight" in the sense that it will be simple to implement, both at the producer and consumer sides, and add minimal extra code to browsers; this is achieved primarily by using an existing compression library rather than a custom algorithm. The compression achieved with this format will depend exactly which compression library is chosen (this is still to be decided); it may not be as good as can be achieved by a font-optimized approach like MTX, but I believe this approach has other advantages that may make it a better overall choice. IMO, it should be simple for browser vendors to support linked fonts using this format; if they need a "complete" font to hand to an existing text API, the original OpenType font can easily be reconstructed in memory, and if they want to access font tables individually from the compressed file, this is very similar to doing so with a standard OpenType font. I'm happy to discuss details of this format, but please, let's keep that discussion separate from the question of whether using a font- specific compression method (independent of whether we ultimately choose something like MTX or something more like ZOT) is the way forward for interoperable web fonts. If we can agree that the overall approach is acceptable, then potential implementers can discuss the technical details of formats, separate from the social, legal and political aspects. Jonathan
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: ZOT_format_draft.txt
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 11:32:44 UTC