W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios

From: Joseph Felps <jfelps@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:59:12 -0500
Message-ID: <e944d2970906292059l3b2cb34en718eb80683748abe@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-font@w3.org

What about also looking at LZMA for comparison.  Average compression
ratio is 30% better than gzip: http://tukaani.org/lzma/ .

There is also some benchmarks comparing gzip, bzip2, and lzma.
http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks

Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 08:16:06 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Daggett: "Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios"
Previous message: Dirk Pranke: "requirements for a web font container format?"
Maybe in reply to: John Daggett: "gzip vs. mtx compression ratios"
Next in thread: John Daggett: "Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 25 July 2009 00:12:02 GMT