This is a general reply to a few recent comments, you can work out for yourselves which is applicable where if you've been following this, and if you haven't then you probably won't care either way. Yes, measure with ems. Please apply some "real world" logic to this, differentiation of Helvetica/Frutiger/Arial/Verdana/Gill/Futura at typical screen sizes is difficult in the extreme - to campaign for diversity in this environment seems to challenge the facts. The x-height analysis in the CSS spec has a high degree of bogosity. Not only does it attempt to justify itself by rendering type as image, it also displays such disparate examples to make the contrasted values meaningless. The differences in pixel rendered x-heights between any of the above named sans serifs at text use sizes, as typical on screen, is negligible. Text should be rendered to screen by specialised rasterisers which examine hint data and thus grid-fit the results - this necessarily homogenises text output for screen. You don't have to be big to be bold. -- CliveReceived on Wednesday, 16 February 2000 13:43:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 25 July 2009 00:12:01 GMT