Re: What's an em

Todd Fahrner wrote at 02/02/00 01:09

>If the requirement were for the level of precision and optical 
>refinement appropriate to hand-set materials (or even better DTP), I 
>would agree.

Shouldn't that be the aim?

>I think the 
>exhibits in CSS-2 speak for themselves.

In that it's unrealistic to compare a sans with a large x-height with a 
semi-calligraphic script with a small x-height?


-- Clive