W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: Current downloadable font status

From: Martin J. Dürst <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 15:41:55 +0200 (MET DST)
To: www-font@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970831154049.11939D-100000@enoshima>
On Sun, 31 Aug 1997 lee@sq.com wrote:

> <OBJECT PI-FONT="Bundesbahn" GLYPH-IDENTIFIER="47">Alt Gif goes here</OBJECT>

> In SGML or XML, one might want to hide this behind an entity, like this:
>     <!Entity Bundesbahn %SDATA;
> 	'<glyph font="Bundesbahn" name="spielnzeitt" id="47">[no fun]</glyph>'
>     >
> where the "no fun" is the text to use if the font isn't available.

That's okay for full-fledged SGML browsers, but the average HTML
browser will have difficulties with %SDATA.


> I have no idea at all why you prefer OBJECT.  I don't mean that in a
> derogatory way.  Why is OBJECT the preferred approach?
> If it's just an image, surely IMG would be better?


IMG is being deprecated, slowly but surely. One problem is that
it doesn't have content. With OBJECT, you can have the [no fun]
part, but not with IMG.

Regards,	Martin.
Received on Sunday, 31 August 1997 09:41:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 25 July 2009 00:12:00 GMT