- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 04:31:12 +0200
- To: "Paskin, Norman (DOI-ELS)" <n.paskin@doi.org>
- Cc: DRM-Public-List <www-drm@w3.org>, Daniel Weitzner <djweitzner@w3.org>
Norman, <indecs> was a major input and we are aware of it. This is reflected in the position-papers and the minutes. I think a table with related activities would help a lot. The interpretation I would make of your statement is, that <indecs> is not well represented in the summary report. I would ask for a suggestion from you and/or Godfrey. I therefor would appreciate, if you could help me reconstruct the table you mentioned. This table was not minuted nor photographed. As I was standing with my back to it as I was chairing the session, I have a somewhat incomplete memory of it. Thanks in advance for your help. Best, Rigo Wenning W3C/INRIA Policy Analyst Privacy Activity Lead mail:rigo@w3.org 2004, Routes des Lucioles +33 (0)6 73 84 87 31 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis http://www.w3.org/ On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:48:06AM +0100, Paskin, Norman (DOI-ELS) wrote: > At the closing session of the W3C DRM meeting, I well recall the final > whiteboarding session which concluded with drawing up three top level > activities which we felt should be reconciled, converged, recognised, or at > least talking to each other. These were W3c (of course), MPEG-21, and > indecs (each of which had been described in the meeting at length). > > I was disappointed therefore to see that the published final Report makes no > mention in "Related Activities" of indecs, or of DOI which is implementing > many of the key issues discussed. The final whitebaorded diagram seems to > have been erased from history. Although there is scattered mention in the > detailed minutes, I believe the final report should reflect this more in > line with the actual discussion. In particular indecs is I believe very > relevant as a study for the development of a Rights Data Dictionary (RDD), a > common dictionary or vocabulary for intellectual property rights, based on > the <indecs> Framework [which outlined the fundamental principals and key > terminology implemented in DOI applications and ONIX (widely used in > publishing and increasingly with audiovisual products)] is even now under > way. (see http://www.doi.org/news/010418-multimediaIP.html. One of the aims > of this study is to provide input to MPEG 21 and other standards activities.
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 22:31:16 UTC