Re: Defining mutation events

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>
> wrote:
> > Sure. Let me talk to Elliott next week because I'm not familiar with his
> > plan that Anne is referring to.
> >
> > Could we discuss this at TPAC? (Will there be a quorum of implementers?)
>
> Yeah, if that helps we could.
>
> I think there's at least three things we can do in parallel:
>
> * Olli's suggestion that other browsers start signaling deprecation
> more aggressively too in the hopes that the numbers go down a bit
> more.
> * We could remove some of the events that are not cross-browser or are
> used less than 0.03%.
> * We can investigate Elliott's plan of dispatching them using custom
> element reactions timing.
>

I discussed this with some folks recently. I think we should pursue
removing all of the events that are not widely used, and attempt to fire
the events that are at CEReactions timing.

- E

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2016 20:34:11 UTC