- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:24:03 +0200
- To: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:52 AM, James Robinson <jamesr@google.com> wrote: > How do they coordinate today? They must at least post to the same task > queue to preserve order. I think what this gets as is the granularity of > task considered by this algorithm. Whatever is making sure that the > fullscreen and screen orientation events are coherent today (i.e. running > out of one task, running in the same task queue, whatever) should continue > to work in this scheme as well. I guess you're correct. Looking at the screen orientation specification it seems to directly hook into the fullscreen element stack changing. If we make that hook explicit there's no need for a more complicated model than FIFO. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 06:24:37 UTC