Re: hasFeature() from Philip Jägenstedt on 2014-01-16 (www-dom@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:10:04 +0700
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAMQvoCnW1v3VgTdoFhTfOFgtEso0EtZ3YgJM=43F-Of5_QRcGQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-domimplementation-hasfeature has a
> weird lifeline basically for SVG and an open issue related to that
> since it's not exactly clear what the details should be. Is SVG moving
> away from the fantastical feature testing world as well? Should we
> just simply always return true?

If it would help, I could attempt to add use counters to Blink, get
help determine how often hasFeature() is used, and how often it
returns false.

Philip

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 16:10:32 UTC