- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:53:33 +0100
- To: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com> wrote: > WDYT about this approach? Is this a reasonable solution? DOMError is going away. We only need DOMException. Allen (editor of ECMAScript) did suggest we do something like what you suggest. Have DOMException.prototype.subname which gives a more detailed name and ideally have DOMException.name be "DOMException" but we can probably no longer do that. Still need to work out the details here unfortunately as apparently last time we thought we figured error handling out we didn't :/ -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 09:54:04 UTC