W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: hardware timestamp for DOM Events.

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:18:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78i2qoMgrY986Y4dRnV6qiuq_V2mEVeon9z80pX7aj=_cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> Not sure I understand why it needs to be in hr-time rather than DOM4 but
> an update to hr-time is easy and we could certainly add
> Event.highResolutionTimestamp if everyone agree using a partial
> interface.

As I said, the rationale at the time was to prevent a dependency on
HTML. DOM now has a dependency on HTML though, to define the origin
and effective script origin of Document objects. Thus at this point
either way works.

I'm a bit hesitant to further embrace the intertwinedness of DOM and
HTML, but maybe I should give up on that and go with the flow.

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 11:18:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:20 UTC