- From: <brandon.wallace@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:38:18 -0600
- To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Jake Verbaten <raynos2@gmail.com>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
> I meant that, if an object with methods were returned, the method should be named "off" as opposed to "cancel" or "stop" etc. Agreed that a function instead of an object is more elegant, however. I believe it has been mentioned that an object leaves the door open for future enhancements. Returning only a function limits your options for future enhancements. -- Brandon
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 13:38:48 UTC