W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2012

[dom] DocumentFragment mutations

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:48:35 +0100
To: "Adam Klein" <adamk@chromium.org>
Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.wbkoi9v364w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
Hey Adam,

So I looked again at these algorithms after our IRC discussion.

1. I managed to avoid some of the DocumentFragment-related duplication as  
discussed: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/rev/ac51d41fb636

2. I did not find transient observers actually requiring additional text  
because concept-node-insert references concept-node-remove for the nodes  
removed from DocumentFragment nodes and concept-node-remove then takes  
care of adding the transient observers.

Now having fully defined all this and given point 2 above it seems to me  
we can inline the "add a transient observer" algorithm. Do you agree? It  
also seems to me we can either remove the "transient observer" concept in  
favor of just having the "transient" variable or the other way around.


Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:49:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:19 UTC