W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: [dom] mutation observers and HTML

From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:51:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4F3E777B.1040404@helsinki.fi>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: www-dom@w3.org, Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On 02/17/2012 04:41 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> The idea still is that HTML is responsible for invoking the callbacks
> and emptying the MutationRecord queues, right? Have you thought about
> what HTML has to say yet Adam?
>

HTML spec should probably define what a microtask means
and then mutation observer spec should just use that mechanism.
Microtask ends when the outermost script execution of
innermost task ends, or if there is no script execution, when
the innermost task ends.



-Olli
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 15:52:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:09 GMT