W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2012

[dom] mutation observer follow up

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:55:33 +0100
To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "Adam Klein" <adamk@chromium.org>
Message-ID: <op.v9tsyvh264w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
Is there any particular reason why the "registered observer" definition is  
sometimes referred to as "registration" and sometimes as "registered  

What is "transient" for?

We need to add some kind of flag to "insert"/"remove" so that "replace  
all" can have a special MutationRecord object for textContent and  
innerHTML and such (and that then "insert"/"remove" not generate  
additional MutationRecord objects).

I'm not sure why there's a special algorithm for adding transient  
observers. How is it different from just appending a transient observer to  
a given node's list?

I also made various changes you should probably review (all editorial  
though, I hope!):


Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 13:56:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:18 UTC