- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:34:06 +0200
- To: "Seo Sanghyeon" <sanxiyn@gmail.com>, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org, www-dom@w3.org
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:07:37 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Seo Sanghyeon: >> Which of the following is true? >> 1. WebIDL specification should be updated. >> 2. DOM4 specification should be updated. >> 3. It is okay for DOM4 specifcation WebIDL to be non-conforming. >> It is for illustrative purpose. > > Either (1) and (2), or just (2). If we wanted to allow the constant to > be used here, it'd need to be NodeFilter.SHOW_ALL or > NodeFilter::SHOW_ALL. But given that we're trying to move away from > numeric constants, I'm not sure if it's worth allowing them to be used > as default values. I've gone with 2. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 10:35:03 UTC